I am tempted to believe in the evidence put forward about the mysterious Bigfoot but recent evidence has shown that it is highly unlikely Bigfoot ever existed. There have been people found putting together contraptions on the bottom of boots that were used to fake primitive footprints. True it is highly unlikely that human tracks could have occurred at certain altitudes with the pressure needed to cause some very convincing primitive footprints. But those footprints were not of the Neanderthal type, we are told.
One of the pieces of evidence which suggests the existence of a Bigfoot is the analysis of the human gait versus others including a being that does not walk like an ape or early man. We have a gait where our foot turns slightly outward when we walk. The being in question walked with his toes turned inward. Then there was an analysis of how the toes leave a different sort of impression in sand opposed to what this other creature could have done; we have a larger distinctive big toe compared to the peas in a pod type of toes produced at certain sites.
A human impression will show a distinctive greater impression since we get a trust from the inside of the foot along a margin with the big toe. This is not so with the impressions found for another creature whose large toe did not demonstrate this thrust. All this has been evidenced from casts done of footprints from around the globe and there is even sufficient variation of the questionable footprints to warrant a consideration of some other kind of being. That other being still remains a mystery.
